Knowledge of genetic diversity informs conservation of a rare, clonal wetland plant Lilaeopsis schaffneriana subsp. recurva (Apiaceae)

Authors

  • Shannon D. Fehlberg Research, Conservation, and Collections Department, Desert Botanical Garden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17348/jbrit.v11.i2.1086

Keywords:

Clonality, Ciénegas, Conservation genetics, Geographic structure, Microsatellites, Multilocus genotypes

Abstract

Ciénegas and other marshland habitats distributed throughout mid-elevations in the American Southwest have declined dramatically over the past century. This decline has likely affected natural processes for many plants and animals dependent on these unique habitats. The primary goal of this study is to describe genetic diversity within and among populations of the U.S. federally endangered Huachuca water umbel, Lilaeopsis schaffneriana subsp. recurva, an herbaceous aquatic perennial endemic to ciénegas and river edges of southeastern Arizona and northern Sonora, Mexico, to learn about its basic biology and inform conservation management. Population samples were collected from 13 sites across the range (287 total samples), and genetic diversity data were gathered for 13 microsatellite loci (five of which were discovered to be monomorphic). Results of data analyses of eight variable microsatellite loci revealed that most populations are dominated by a single multilocus genetic clone; only two populations have more than one multilocus genetic clone present (represented by more than one individual). Genetic diversity is low within populations, but genetic differences do exist among most populations. Those populations that are very similar to one another likely experienced recent or historical gene flow. Conservation considerations should include preserving multiple, genetically distinct populations as well as maintaining local population connectivity and quality of suitable habitat for the establishment of new clones.

 

References

Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Syst. Bot. Monogr. 6:1–140.
Amos, W. & A. Balmford. 2001. When does conservation genetics matter? Heredity 87:257–265.
Balloux, F., L. Lehmann, & T. de Meecus. 2003. The population genetics of clonal and partially clonal diploids. Genetics 164:1635–1644.
Bone, T.S., S.R. Downie, J.M. Affolter, & K. Spalik. 2011. A phylogenetic and biogeographic study of the genus Lilaeopsis (Apiaceae Tribe Oenantheae). Syst. Bot. 36:789–805.
Booy, G., R.J.J. Hendriks, M.J.M. Smulders, J.M. Van Groenendael, & B. Vosman. 2000. Genetic diversity and the survival of populations. Pl. Biol. 2:379–395.
Brzyski, J.R. & T.M. Culley. 2011. Genetic variation and clonal structure of the rare, riparian shrub Spiraea virginiana (Rosaceae). Conservation Genet. 12:1323–1332.
Evans, S.M., E.A. Sinclair, A.G. Poore, P.D. Steinberg, G.A. Kendrick, & A. Vergés. 2014. Genetic diversity in threatened Posidonia australis seagrass meadows. Conservation Genet. 15:717–728.
Fehlberg, S.D. 2012. Assessing genetic distinctness of Huachuca Water Umbel (Lilaeopsis schaffneriana subsp. recurva) on Fort Huachuca, Arizona and other regional sites. Unpublished report. Environmental and Natural Resource Division, Directorate of Public Works, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Huachuca, Arizona, U.S.A.
Gitzendanner, M.A., C.W. Weekley, C.C. Germain-Aubrey, D.E. Soltis, & P.S. Soltis. 2012. Microsatellite evidence for high clonality and limited genetic diversity in Ziziphus celata (Rhamnaceae), an endangered, self-incompatible shrub endemic to the Lake Wales Ridge, Florida, USA. Conservation Genet. 13:223–234.
Hendrickson, D.A. & W.L. Minckley. 1985. Ciénegas: Vanishing climax communities of the American Southwest. Desert Pl. 6:130–176.
Johansson, M.E. & C. Nilsson. 1993. Hydrochory, population dynamics and distribution of the clonal aquatic plant Ranunculus lingua. J. Ecol. 81:81–91.
Lance, S.L., C.N. Love, S.O. Nunziata, J.R. O’Bryhim, D.E. Scott, R.W. Flynn, & K.L. Jones. 2013. 32 species validation of a new Illumina paired-end approach for the development of microsatellites. PLoS ONE 8(11):e81853.
Malcom, J.W., A.C. Malcom, & W.R. Radke. 2017. Water (or the lack thereof), management, and conservation of an endangered desert wetland obligate, Lilaeopsis schaffneriana var. recurva. PeerJ Preprints 5:e2699v1. doi:10.7287/peerj.preprints.2699v1
Martin, A.P., E. Paulson, & G. Graham. 2013. Geographically disjunct populations and widespread genets in an endangered halophilic plant, the Amargosa niterwort (Nitrophila mohavensis). Conservation Genet. 14:953–962.
Minckley, T.A., D.S. Turner, & S.R. Weinstein. 2013. The relevance of wetland conservation in arid regions: a re-examination of vanishing communities in the American Southwest. J. Arid Environm. 88:213–221.
Nybom, H. 2004. Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Molec. Ecol. 13:1143–1155.
Peakall, R. & P.E. Smouse. 2006. GENALEX 6:genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molec. Ecol. Notes 6:288–295.
Peakall, R. & P.E. Smouse. 2012. GENALEX 6.5:genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinf. 28:2537–2539.
Reusch, T.B. 2006. Does disturbance enhance genotypic diversity in clonal organisms? A field test in the marine angiosperm Zostera marina. Molec. Ecol. 15:277–286.
Rice, W.R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evol. 43:223–225.
Sampson, J.F. & M. Byrne. 2016. Assessing genetic structure in a rare clonal eucalypt as a basis for augmentation and introduction translocations. Conservation Genet. 17:293–304.
Spalik, K., M. Piwczynski, C.A. Danderson, R. Kurzyna-M?ynik, T.S. Bone, & S.R. Downie. 2010. Amphitropic amphiantarctic disjunctions in Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae. J. Biogeogr. 37:1977–1994.
Stromberg, J.C., R. Tiller, & B. Richter. 1996. Effects of groundwater decline on riparian vegetation of semiarid regions: The San Pedro, Arizona. Ecol. Applic. 6:113–131.
Tew, J.M., S.L. Lance, K.L. Jones, & S.D. Fehlberg. 2012. Microsatellite development for an endangered riparian inhabitant, Lilaeopsis schaffneriana subsp. recurva (Apiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. Primer Notes Protoc. 99:e164–166.
Tew, J.M., S.L. Lance, K.L. Jones, & S.D. Fehlberg. 2017. Correction to microsatellite development for an endangered riparian inhabitant, Lilaeopsis schaffneriana subsp. recurva (Apiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 104:794. doi:10.3732/ajb.1100517_ERR
Titus, P.J. & J.H. Titus. 2008a. Ecological monitoring of the endangered huachuca water umbel (Lilaeopsis schaffneriana ssp. recurva:Apiaceae). S.W. Naturalist 53:458–465.
Titus, P.J. & J.H. Titus. 2008b. Assessing the reintroduction potential of the endangered huachuca water umbel in southeastern Arizona. Ecol. Restorat. 26:311–20.
Titus, P.J. & J.H. Titus. 2008c. Seedbank of Bingham Cienega, a spring-fed marsh in southeastern Arizona. S.W. Naturalist 53:393–399.
Unmack, P.J. & W.L. Minckley. 2008. The demise of desert springs. In: L.E. Stevens & V.J. Meretsky, eds. Aridland springs in North America: Ecology and conservation. The University of Arizona Press and The Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A. Pp. 11–34.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. 2016. Draft recovery plan for Lilaeopsis schaffneriana ssp. recurva (Huachuca water umbel). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest Region, Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A.
Wright, S. 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19:395–420.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-29

How to Cite

Fehlberg, S. D. (2017). Knowledge of genetic diversity informs conservation of a rare, clonal wetland plant Lilaeopsis schaffneriana subsp. recurva (Apiaceae). Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, 11(2), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.17348/jbrit.v11.i2.1086