Correlation of mescaline concentrations in Lophophora williamsii (Cactaceae) with rib numbers and diameter of crown (U.S.A.)

  • Richard Newbold
  • Sohan De Silva
  • Martin Terry


Lophophora williamsii, peyote, is a small cactus growing to approximately 10 cm in diameter with a flat to dome-shaped spineless crown with fissures or ribs that develop following the Fibonacci series and whose numbers indicate relative degree of maturing. In this study crown tissue of 30 wild-collected specimens was analyzed to determine whether there was a correlation between the concentration of the primary alkaloid mescaline in crown tissue with the average diameter of the crown. We also compared mescaline concentration in three groups of ten individuals: 5 ribs (juvenile stage), 8 ribs (intermediate), and 13 ribs (elder/mature stage), since these Fibonacci numbers are the most stable and long-lasting on L. williamsii. This was designed to test the hypothesis that there is a positive correlation between mescaline concentration and both diameter and rib number. Nine greenhouse-grown specimens were likewise analyzed to serve as a control group for the study. All 39 tissue samples were subjected to an alkaloid extraction procedure followed by an acid-base washing procedure. Mescaline was identified using liquid-chromatography and mass spectroscopy and then quantified using reverse-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography. The Pearson’s Chi-squared test showed no statistical correlation between increasing mescaline concentration and increasing rib numbers for field-collected samples and greenhouse?raised control samples. Field-collected samples: P-value of 0.392; greenhouse control samples: P-value of 0.313. Similarly, field and greenhouse samples showed no statistical correlation between mescaline concentration and average diameter of the crown. Field-collected samples: P-value of 0.251; greenhouse control samples: P-value of 0.229. This study contributes to the understanding of this vulnerable species and to approaches to its overall conservation and the preservation of Native American culture.


Aljbory, Z. & M. Chen. 2018. Indirect plant defenses against insect herbivory: A review. Insect Sci. Applic. 25:2–23.

Amirkia, V. & M. Heinrich. 2014. Alkaloids as drug leads–A predictive structural and biodiversity-based analysis. Phytochem. Lett. 10:48–53.

Anderson, E.F. 1995. The “peyote gardens” of South Texas: A conservation crisis. Cact. Succ. J., Affil. Reporter 67:67–74.

Anderson, E.F. 1996. Peyote: The divine cactus. The University of Arizona Press, Phoenix, U.S.A. 2:1–204.

Bennett, R. & R. Wallsgrove. 1994. Secondary metabolites in plant defense mechanisms. New Phytol. 137:617–633.

Buchanan, B., W. Gruissen, & R. Jones. 2000. Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants: Chapter 24. Natural Products (secondary metabolites). Curr. Topics Pl. Physiol. 1250–1305.

Carod-Artal, F.J. & C.B. Vázquez-Cabrera. 2006. Mescaline and the San Pedro cactus ritual: Archaeological and ethnographic evidence in northern Peru. Revista de Neurologia 42:489–498.

Cipollini, M.L. & D.J. Levey. 1997. Secondary metabolites of fleshy vertebrate?dispersed fruits: Adaptive hypotheses and implications for seed dispersal. Amer. Naturalist 150:346–372.

Correll, D.S. & M.C. Johnston. 1970. Manual of the vascular plants of Texas. Texas Research Foundation, Renner, U.S.A.

Crozier, A., M.N. Cliford, & H. Ashihara. 2006. Plant secondary metabolites: Occurrence, structure and role in the human diet. Wiley-Blackfield, Oxford, U.K. 4.1–200.

Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice. 2017. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Section 1301.11.

Freeman, B.C. & G.A. Beattie. 2008. An overview of plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores. The Plant Health Instructor 10:1094

Gibson, A. & P. Nobel. 1986. The cactus primer. Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A. 140–145.

Gimenez, E., M. Salinas, & F. Manzano-Agugliaro. 2018. Worldwide research on plant defense against biotic stresses as improvement for sustainable agriculture. Sustainability 10:1–19.

Hahn, P.G., A.A. Agrawal, K.I. Sussman, & J.L. Maron. 2019. Population environmental gradients, and the evolutionary ecology of plant defense against herbivory. Amer. Naturalist 193:20–31.

Hesse, M. 2002. Alkaloids: Nature’s Cure or Blessing? Wiley-VCH, Zürich, Switzerland.

Hulsey, D., P. Daley, N. Fowler, M. Kalam, & M. Terry. 2011. Clinal geographic variation in mescaline concentration among Texas populations of Lophophora williamsii (Cactaceae). J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 5:677–683.

Huxley, A. 1952. The doors of perception. Mental. 98:2–24.

Ibarra-Laclette, E., F. Zamudio-Hernández, C. Pérez-Torres, V.A. Albert, E. Ramírez-Chávez, J. Molina-Torres, A. Fernández-Cortes, C. Calderón-Vázquez, J.L. Olivares-Romero, A. Herrera-Estrella, & L. Herrera-Estrella. 2015. De novo sequencing and analysis of Lophophora williamsii transcriptome, and searching for putative genes involved in mescaline biosynthesis. B. M. C. Genomics 16:1–14.

International Union for Conservation of Nature [IUCN]. 2013. Lophophora williamsii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available at Accessed August 2018.

Kalam, M.A., M.T. Klein, D. Hulsey, K. Trout, P. Daley, & M. Terry. 2013. Mescaline concentrations in small regrowth crowns vs. mature adult crowns of Lophophora williamsii (Cactaceae): Cultural, economic, and conservation implications. J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 7:435–440.

Klein, M., M. Kalam, K. Trout, N. Fowler, & M. Terry. 2015. Mescaline concentration in three principal tissues of Lophophora williamsii (Cactaceae): Implications for sustainable harvesting practices. Haseltonia 20:34–42.

Kulma, A. & J. Szopa. 2007. Catecholamines are active compounds in plants. Pl. Sci. 172:433–440.

Lundström, J. 1971. Biosynthesis of mescaline and tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloids in Lophophora williamsii (Lem.) Coult. Occurrence and bio-synthesis of catecholamine and other intermediates. Acta Chem. Scand. 25:3489–3499.

Lundström, J. 1972. Identification of new peyote alkaloids; isomers of the main phenolic tetrahydroisoquinolines. Acta Chem. Scand. 26:1295–1297.

McKey, D. 1974. Adaptive patterns in alkaloid physiology. Amer. Naturalist108:305–314.

Schaefer, B. 2015. Natural products in the chemical industry. Springer, Berlin & Heidelberg, Germany. 2:276.

Rosengarten, H. & A.J. Friedhoff. 1976. A review of recent studies of the biosynthesis and excretion of hallucinogens formed by methylation of neurotransmitters or related substances. Schizophrenia Bull. 2:1–90.

Rosenberg, H. & S.J. Stohs. 1974. The utilization of tyrosine for mescaline and protein biosynthesis in Lophophora williamsii. Phytochemistry 13:1861–1863.

Terry, M. & J.D. Mauseth. 2006. Root-shoot anatomy and post-harvest vegetative clonal development in Lopophora williamsii (Cactaceae: Cactaeae): Implications for conservation. Sida 22:565–592.

Terry, M., K. Trout, B. Williams, T. Herrera, & N. Fowler. 2011. Limitations to natural production of Lophophora williamsii (Cactaceae). I. Regrowth and survivorship two years post-harvest in a South Texas population. J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 5:661–675.

Terry, M, K. Trout, B. Williams, T. Herrera, & N. Fowler. 2012. Limitations to natural production of Lophophora williamsii (Cactaceae). Effects of repeated harvesting at two-year intervals in a South Texas population. J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 6:567–577.

Terry, M. 2013. Lophophora williamsii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013 Available at Accessed March 17.

Trout, K. 2014. Cactus chemistry by species. Mydriatic Productions, U.S.A. 1:37–40.

Trout, K. 2016. Peyote sales reported 1986–2016. Cactus Conservation Institute. Available at Accessed October 2019.

TPWD. 2016. Texas land owners earn lone star land steward awards for conservation efforts. Available at Accessed March 2017.

Tuller, J., R.J. Marquis, S.M. Andrade, A.B. Montelro, & L. Farla. 2018. Trade-offs between growth, reproduction and defense in response to resource availability manipulations. PLOS ONE 13:1–12.

Walsh, C.J. 2017. Plant alkaloids and terpenoids in chemotherapy. Salem Press Encyclopedia of Health. Salen Press, Hackensack, New Jersey, U.S.A. 1:1–6.

Wink, M. 2003. Evolution of secondary metabolites from an ecological and molecular phylogenetic perspective. Phytochemistry 64:3–19.

How to Cite
Newbold, R., De Silva, S., & Terry, M. (2020). Correlation of mescaline concentrations in Lophophora williamsii (Cactaceae) with rib numbers and diameter of crown (U.S.A.). Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, 14(1), 103-120.